Skip navigation.

Main Menu
Other Links
http://www.wsvn.com/features/template_articles_wsvn.html/investigations/DBM1425/
WSVN-TV
Friday, May 27, 2005

Pentagon Plot

Patrick Fraser

Reported by

Patrick Fraser

Producer

Diana Reed

Contact

dreed@wsvn.com

Search 7 News Investigation:

Special Features

Help Me Howard

Radio Contest Controversy

Medical Reports

Doc Talk: Migraines

Fertility Fix

A Bite with Belkys

Chicken Tikka Masala From Royal India Restaurant

7 News Features

Tush Push

Free For All

7 News Investigation

Pentagon Plot

7's Lexus Style Files

Divas Who Dine

More Bang for Your Buck

Identity Theft

Room for Improvement

Tuscan Bedroom Makeover

[more reports]

 

Have a question for 7News health experts? Send it to DocTalk@wsvn.com.

 

What consumer battle are you fighting? Maybe Howard can help! Send it to helpmehoward@wsvn.com .

7 News Investigation

Pentagon Plot

Air Date: 05/23/2005

Reported by: Patrick Fraser

Producer: Diana Reed

Email this story to a friend. Email this story to a friend

Several people are now claiming that is not what happened at all. They claim that the plane that crashed was not a passenger jet at all, and that it was all a plot to mislead the American people. Here's the nighteam's Patrick Fraser with his special report: "Pentagon Plot."

WSVN -- We never put a man on the moon, these pictures were taken in the Nevada desert the conspiracy theories claimed...

President Kennedy was not shot just by Lee Harvey Oswald. The CIA was involved...

And now this one..it was not a passenger plan that crashed into The Pentagon on September 11th.

Scientist Dr. A.K. Dewdney: "I mean how much evidence do people need."

A.K. Dewdney is one of several scientists who have investigated the pentagon crash and concluded something devious and diabolical happened that day.

Their proof...

They say a Boeing 757 was never found at The Pentagon, that only one engine was found and that engine does not seem to match the engine from a 757, that airplane crashes leave wreckage, they mess up the ground -- Not at The Pentagon.

Patrick Fraser: "Dr. Dewdney you also wrote that the wings are missing from the crash site -- I thought they were incinerated in the enormous blaze inside The Pentagon."

Dr. Dewdney: "The structure of the wings dictate that the wings should have sheared off. The fact that there is no wing debris outside the building indicates it was not a 757 that struck the pentagon."

Another point the conspiracy buffs make -- the hole in the side of The Pentagon is too small for a 757 to fit thru. One web page even superimposes a 757 onto the ground to prove its point.

Dr. Dewdney: "So all of this evidence is just sitting there waiting for people to examine it."

The conspiracy theories even claim to have video proof from a security camera outside The Pentagon as the plane neared the building -- they claim the picture is not a 757.

But they are not certain what type of craft it is.

Dr.Dewdney: "The guesses vary from an F-16 loaded with a depleted uranium warhead -- possibly a cruise missile."

But if its a cruise missile, what happened to the plane and its passengers. Dr. Dewdney says they don't know, however they say they do know who is behind the conspiracy.

Dewdney says all the September 11th attacks were planned or allowed to happen to fuel a war with terrorists and as an excuse to invade and gain control of the oil in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Dr. Dewdney: "If we are right the implications are profound."

Right or right off the wacko chart, common sense tells you its not likely. In fact common sense tells you its not only outrageous -- its ridiculous and one well known skeptic has another description for it -- laughable.

James Randi from the Randi Educational Foundation: "Come on, in order to do a thing like that you would have to have a conspiracy that would involve thousands of people..all of whom would have to be completely silent. Now thats impossible to do."

We showed James Randi the claims of Dewdney's scientific group, and he countered each one -- beginning with the hole in The Pentagon.

James Randi: "Now the hole isnt big enough. Oh I see now you know how big the hole should be do you? No, that's data that we simply don't have."

As for those missing wings -- easy to explain Randi says.

James Randi: "That the fuselage penetrates the brick wall and the wings fold back just like an umbrella."

Finally the people who helped Dewdney research his theories are all well educated, very intelligent people which Randi says proves one more thing.

James Randi: "Well-educated intelligent people doesn't mean smart people."

Dewdney's reply -- prove him wrong.

Dr. Dewdney: "By all means get in touch with us none of us want to spend our time doing this if we are just wasting our time if we are wrong."

And even if he is wrong, a few people may believe him -- but a few million won't.

By the way we spoke with The Pentagon about the conspiracy theory, and they said, "it's so ridiculous, we don't even address it."

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Contact: pfraser@wsvn.com

 

Dewdneys Scientific Conclusions
http://www.physics911.net/