VIDEOS THAT DISINFORM ABOUT 9/11


We'll always try to give a reason for a video's inclusion on this list, so you can decide for yourself. If we don't give a reason, you probably should not believe us. If we do give a reason, check it out for yourself. In other words, just because a video appears on this list does not necessarily mean that the video is definitely dedicated to serving the coverup of the worst crime in U.S. history -- maybe it was just mistaken, or maybe we are. You decide. Coversely, just because a video does not appear on this list (there are way too many to name) does not mean that we have been fooled into believing that video is presenting all the truth it could about 9/11.

If you know a video we've failed to include on this list, or believe one has been placed on it by mistake, please tell us about it. (NOTE: the preceding link is one of the only links on this page which does not take you to disinformation. For the rest of this page, you should click with caution...)

ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, NBC, PBS, Democracy Now and others all pretend to tell us everything we need to know in order to give informed consent to a representative government. Instead, they fill our heads with less than what we need, and they all do so knowingly.

Who Killed John O'Neill? - is the most noxious of all 9/11 disinformation videos. It not only subliminally reinforces the "Atta did it" and "Osama did it" cover story on a multitude of levels, but it attacks 9/11 truth advocates in a variety of ways, including how it suggests they ought to see themselves and how they ought to be seen by others. It is brilliantly efficient and effective propaganda. It was produced and directed by someone calling himself Ty Rauber. Someone calling himself Richard Andrew Grove, who belately burst onto the 9/11 truth scene via Meria Heller with a quite lengthy audio manifesto, is one of the most enthusiastic promoters of this video, and a self-proclaimed friend of Rauber.

911: Press for Truth - is the latest disinformation video from long-known leading 9/11 disinformer Kyle Hence, based upon the Osama-blaming 9/11 "terror timeline" by long-recognized 9/11 disinformer "Paul Thompson" (not his real name). The underlying disinfo is this: when people such as Kyle Hence, who is known for supposedly opposing the government's version of events, also blame Osama for 9/11, then that permanently settles that issue in the minds of most people. And disinformation agent Hence's video, as per the government's absurd conspiracy theory of 9/11, falsely blames Islamic fundamentalists for 9/11 repeatedly, on a variety of levels, subliminal and not.

Everybody's Got To Learn Sometime - tries to appear to oppose the official version of events, but agrees in the most substantive way of all: it promotes the government's "Able Danger" disinformation and blames Islamic fundamentalists for 9/11 repeatedly, on a variety of levels, subliminal and not, while suppressing all the pieces of evidence which make it impossible to believe that lie. It starts by rapid-fire reimpressing on viewers' minds so many of the horrible, deadly, emotional images from that day, which everyone will see (unless they shut their eyes) and feel (reminding them of what they were told had happened and how it made them feel), and which will hinder their ability to think clearly about the event from a logic-based perspective, and also softens them up for the hijacker-blaming propaganda which follows. It was produced by John J. Albanese. Nick Levis is listed as the research consultant. It is based upon the physical-evidence-denying, purported-hijacker-blaming work of disinformers Mike Ruppert, Daniel Hopsicker, and Paul Thompson [sic]. David Ray Griffin is also credited as having contributed to this highly disinformative, coverup serving, propaganda video.

The Great Conspiracy - by disinformative media critic Barrie Zwicker, who, about 44 minutes into the video, tells his desperate lie 5 times in several minutes, in a blatant attempt to get his audience to disregard President Bush's TV watching recollections of the morning of 9/11, recollections which indicate prior knowledge at the highest level of the U.S. government.

911: Dust and Deceit - by Penny Little. This video, like all good disinformation, is basically true. Yet the video itself is highly misdirective and thus misleading, because it gets viewers barking up the wrong tree, by framing the investigation falsely, by asking the less-meaningful "What was in the Dust?" question, to the exclusion of ever asking the more-meaningful-and-revealing "Why are there so many nanoparticles in the dust?" question. (In other words, the unprecedented, incredibly ultra-tiny size of the particles -- far tinier than what "pulverization" or "explosions" can create -- is more interesting, more pertinent, and more revealing than their chemical composition.) By totally omitting any mention at all of that much bigger, much more revealing truth as it leaves its viewers feeling as if they've just learned most of what there is to be learned from that unusual WTC 'dust', "Dust and Deceit" helps perpetuate a major aspect of the ongoing 9/11 coverup, by helping to keep certain thoughts from ever entering the heads of people who are suspicious about 9/11.

This list is incomplete.